Try it now · No account

Drop a drawing.
See what we read.

LevelPlane extracts dimensions and features from 2D engineering drawings instantly. Drop yours to see the output — free, no signup, no email.

Drop your drawing here

or browse to select a file

PDF · PNG · JPEG

Release to analyze

Your file is not uploaded or stored — this is a demo; output is illustrative.

Backed by
Accel Google AI Futures Fund
OEMs and their suppliers · automotive, aerospace
Benchmarks

Highest fidelity at every stage of the read.

Evaluated against the latest frontier vision-language models including GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, and Gemini 3.1 Pro on intent extraction from 2D engineering drawings. Full benchmark releasing August 2026 against a held-out test set of 250 drawings sampled across automotive and aerospace, scored by domain experts.

Releasing August 2026
Test set
250 drawings, automotive and aerospace, held out
Evaluation
Per-feature accuracy, scored by domain experts
Compared against
GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro
Status
Methodology and results forthcoming
Try it yourself EIM · live

Watch the read.

Drawing arrives. EIM perceives geometry, resolves structure, infers intent, then surfaces what matters for sourcing. The full reasoning chain, in fourteen seconds.

EIM · live
v0.4
PART NO PRT-7821 MATL AL 7075-T6 REV C FRONT SIDE 210.00 ±0.05 140 Ø 52 H7 +0.030/0 2× Ø 14 ±0.05 0.02 A B A Ra 0.8
Bore · Ø 52 H7
Bearing seat
Precision-ground · class A
Perpendicularity ⊥ 0.02
Mating surface
Drives CMM inspection
Surface finish · Ra 0.8
Class B sealing
Milling, no secondary
$
Should-cost
$48.20 / unit
12k units · 4-axis machining
Suppliers matched
3 ranked
Class A surface · NADCAP
!
Risk flag
Tolerance stack on bore
Review with engineering
Architecture

Not one model. The right model for each layer of the read.

EIM orchestrates frontier vision-language models, graph reasoning over part structure, and large language models for intent. Composed and verified as one system. We do not compete with the labs. We use them, and beat them by composing them with engineering ground truth.

L1 / Perception What it sees
Detects views, primitives, annotations, dimension lines, GD&T frames, surface finish symbols, and title blocks. Frontier VLMs fine-tuned on engineering drawing primitives.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom fine-tunes
L2 / Structure How it holds together
Resolves dimension chains, datum relationships, GD&T composite references, and geometric tolerance stacks. The parsed drawing is mapped to a structured graph and reasoned over symbolically.
Graph representation Symbolic constraint solver
L3 / Intent Why it matters
Infers function, criticality, sourcing implication, and design intent from the structured representation. Frontier LLMs conditioned on L1 and L2 outputs, retrieval-augmented with your historical context.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemini 3.1 Pro Customer-grounded RAG
Orchestration Routing & verification
Routing, evaluation, fallbacks, and ground-truth checks across all three layers. This is where most of our IP sits. Not in any single model, but in the system that picks the right one for each sub-task and verifies the answer against engineering ground truth.

Why orchestration over a monolith. No single frontier model wins across perception, structure, and intent. By composing the best model for each sub-task, and replacing components as the labs ship, EIM compounds every advance in frontier AI. Every Claude or Gemini release makes EIM better automatically.

Built on top of EIM

Every workflow inherits the read.

The same model that reads the drawing decides what to source, who to ask, what to compare, and what to flag.

Two sides, one model

Whether you buy parts or make them, the read is the same.

For OEMs

Should-cost every part. Benchmark every supplier. In hours, not weeks.

The analysis your sourcing team would do if they had time, run automatically the moment a drawing lands. Should-cost, supplier benchmarking, and risk surfaced from the drawing itself.

For suppliers

Quote like a team three times your size.

RFQ ingest, structured response, sub-supplier dispatch. First quote back wins.

Research / 2026

A drawing is a record of decisions. We are building the system that reads them.

EIM is a research program, not a feature.

We're building a model that reads engineering drawings, orchestrating frontier vision-language models, graph reasoning over part structure, and large language models for intent inference. Starting with 2D drawings, expanding to 3D CAD, statements of requirements, and supplier specifications.

Two patents filed on contract-native agent authority and outcome-gated control.

Pricing

Simple, usage-based pricing.

Start free. Pay as you go. No subscriptions, no seats.

Free trial — no credit card required.
Try two drawings for free. See exactly what EIM reads before spending a cent.
Standard
$199
100 credits
$1.99 / credit · pay as you go

Buy credits and run drawings through the core engine. No subscription, no seats.

  • Core drawing processing — perception → structure → intent
  • Automated should-cost estimation
  • Self-service. Start in minutes.

How many credits does a drawing use?

Simple drawing
~20 credits
Basic part, few features, standard tolerances
Medium drawing
~40 credits
Multiple views, GD&T, several annotations
Complex drawing
~80 credits
Assembly, dense tolerancing, full title block